Skip to main content

Table 1 Reliability and scale descriptives of the mindfulness measures

From: Revisiting the five-facet structure of mindfulness

 

M

SD

α

α low

α high

ω

ω low

ω high

GLB

H

CAMS-R attention

2.20

0.62

.731

.679

.775

.731

.671

.772

.726

.735

CAMS-R present focus

2.48

0.57

.491

.396

.573

.509

.385

.595

.518

.528

CAMS-R awareness

2.39

0.62

.581

.504

.656

.590

.506

.655

.595

.611

CAMS-R acceptance

2.65

0.67

.605

.517

.666

.606

.529

.664

.603

.614

Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory

2.55

0.47

.823

.796

.848

.826

.794

.849

.856

.853

Langer Mindfulness Scale engagement

4.97

0.97

.598

.514

.672

.605

.518

.668

.616

.626

Langer Mindfulness Scale novelty producing

4.30

0.93

.653

.591

.709

.689

.637

.736

.742

.790

Langer Mindfulness Scale novelty seeking

5.33

0.92

.761

.713

.801

.761

.715

.799

.786

.781

MAAS

3.46

0.73

.837

.810

.862

.839

.811

.863

.839

.865

Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale awareness

3.52

0.62

.811

.779

.839

.812

.777

.839

.865

.830

Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale acceptance

3.47

0.78

.876

.855

.895

.876

.852

.894

.891

.886

Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire

3.79

0.84

.865

.844

.885

.867

.843

.886

.902

.878

Kentucky Mindfulness Inventory observing

3.24

0.62

.810

.779

.838

.810

.777

.839

.832

.814

Kentucky Mindfulness Inventory describing

3.05

0.77

.870

.847

.888

.875

.854

.894

.882

.895

Kentucky Mindfulness Inventory acting with awareness

2.71

0.49

.657

.600

.710

.645

.572

.705

.758

.787

Kentucky Mindfulness Inventory non-judging

2.86

0.77

.863

.840

.884

.869

.843

.887

.908

.892

  1. Notes: α and ω are reported with 95% bias corrected confidence intervals
  2. GLB greatest lower bound, H coefficient H