Skip to main content

Table 2 Standardized factor loadings and composite reliabilities (CR) for CFA and ESEM in subsamples 1 and 2

From: Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index

Subsample 1

CFA

ESEM

Items

FS

PD

PT

EC

FS

PD

PT

EC

 2

.65

   

.61

− .15

.02

.07

 7

.52

   

.45

.24

− .05

.09

 12

.74

   

.85

− .02

.01

− .11

 15

.61

   

.50

.06

.16

.04

 3

 

.64

  

.11

.63

− .01

− .06

 6

 

.79

  

− .06

.79

.00

.01

 8

 

.77

  

− .04

.79

.08

.03

 13

 

.53

  

.06

.49

− .09

.03

 4

  

.64

 

− .07

− .02

.70

− .03

 10

  

.62

 

.04

.02

.64

− .05

 14

  

.59

 

.15

− .06

.48

.11

 16

  

.70

 

.01

.02

.68

.05

 1

   

.48

− .03

− .22

.08

.61

 5

   

.50

.04

.02

− .03

.51

 9

   

.68

.19

.05

− .05

.52

 11

   

.53

.12

.09

.06

.37

 CR

.72

.78

.73

.63

.70

.78

.72

.58

Subsample 2

CFA

ESEM

items

FS

PD

PT

EC

FS

PD

PT

EC

 2

.61

   

.48

− .07

.03

.20

 7

.57

   

.61

.22

− .06

− .05

 12

.74

   

.65

− .02

.00

.13

 15

.60

   

.60

.05

.11

− .02

 3

 

.55

  

− .02

.49

− .07

.14

 6

 

.75

  

− .04

.77

.03

.00

 8

 

.77

  

.03

.78

.07

− .02

 13

 

.46

  

.07

.40

− .21

.11

 4

  

.64

 

− .06

.03

.74

− .03

 10

  

.65

 

.00

.01

.69

.01

 14

  

.68

 

.23

.01

.54

.06

 16

  

.72

 

.14

− .04

.63

.02

 1

   

.54

.02

− .08

.08

.54

 5

   

.48

.01

.01

.18

.39

 9

   

.66

.10

.09

.01

.56

 11

   

.57

− .05

.06

− .03

.64

 CR

.73

.73

.77

.65

.68

.71

.74

.62

  1. Note: Formal item-to-scale affiliations printed in bold. CR = Raykov’s composite reliability