Skip to main content

Table 2 Standardized factor loadings and composite reliabilities (CR) for CFA and ESEM in subsamples 1 and 2

From: Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index

Subsample 1CFAESEM
ItemsFSPDPTECFSPDPTEC
 2.65   .61− .15.02.07
 7.52   .45.24− .05.09
 12.74   .85− .02.01− .11
 15.61   .50.06.16.04
 3 .64  .11.63− .01− .06
 6 .79  − .06.79.00.01
 8 .77  − .04.79.08.03
 13 .53  .06.49− .09.03
 4  .64 − .07− .02.70− .03
 10  .62 .04.02.64− .05
 14  .59 .15− .06.48.11
 16  .70 .01.02.68.05
 1   .48− .03− .22.08.61
 5   .50.04.02− .03.51
 9   .68.19.05− .05.52
 11   .53.12.09.06.37
 CR.72.78.73.63.70.78.72.58
Subsample 2CFAESEM
itemsFSPDPTECFSPDPTEC
 2.61   .48− .07.03.20
 7.57   .61.22− .06− .05
 12.74   .65− .02.00.13
 15.60   .60.05.11− .02
 3 .55  − .02.49− .07.14
 6 .75  − .04.77.03.00
 8 .77  .03.78.07− .02
 13 .46  .07.40− .21.11
 4  .64 − .06.03.74− .03
 10  .65 .00.01.69.01
 14  .68 .23.01.54.06
 16  .72 .14− .04.63.02
 1   .54.02− .08.08.54
 5   .48.01.01.18.39
 9   .66.10.09.01.56
 11   .57− .05.06− .03.64
 CR.73.73.77.65.68.71.74.62
  1. Note: Formal item-to-scale affiliations printed in bold. CR = Raykov’s composite reliability