From: Structural validation of the “Teacher’s report form” attention problems scale in a Brazilian sample
| ξa ← xb | Mic |
| HIe ← I17 | 10.329 |
| HI ← I22 | 87.412 |
| HI ← I60 | 46.413 |
| If ← HI7 | 22.853 |
| I ← HI67 | 12.242 |
| I ← HI73 | 85.128 |
| I ← HI74 | 10.299 |
| εi ↔ εjd | Mi |
| HI2 ↔ I1 | 31.351 |
| HI53 ↔ HI93 | 20.798 |
| HI73 ↔ I22 | 36.669 |
| HI73 ↔ I60 | 17.298 |
| HI73 ↔ I61 | 16.447 |
| HI93 ↔ I22 | 13.777 |
| I4 ↔ I8 | 21.350 |
| I17 ↔ I49 | 23.096 |
| I17 ↔ I61 | 22.441 |
| I17 ↔ I80 | 75.618 |
| I17 ↔ I92 | 26.543 |
| I49 ↔ I61 | 10.238 |
| I49 ↔ I80 | 21.200 |
| I49 ↔ I92 | 22.447 |
| I61 ↔ I80 | 21.932 |
| I61 ↔ I92 | 21.403 |
| I80 ↔ I92 | 21.432 |