Skip to main content

Table 3 Individual group CFA model fit indices for each cultural sample

From: Four-dimensional hierarchical structure of love constructs in a cross-cultural perspective

Model

Cultural sample

χ2

BIC

df

CFI

RMSEA [90% CI]

SRMR

1

Brazil

2060.865

31331.848

806

0.833

.089 [.085, .094]

.065

2

Iran

2277.181

28292.263

806

0.770

.089 [.085, .094]

.080

3

Portugal

2076.252

27139.002

806

0.826

.091 [.086, .096]

.067

4

Saint Petersburg, Russia

2099.277

37969.917

806

0.858

.084 [.080, .089]

.049

5

Tyumen, Russia

2184.895

39652.294

806

0.835

.086 [.082, .091]

.056

6

Hawaii, USA

2024.954

27735.398

806

0.834

.089 [.084, .094]

.060

7

Midwest, USA

1840.879

13401.962

806

0.793

0.106 [0.100, 0.113]

.057

8

Southeast, USA

2251.132

49074.915

806

0.862

.080 [.076, .084]

.052

9

Turkey

4881.180

14717.393

806

0.729

.082 [.077, .087]

.084

  1. χ2 = robust χ2 test of global fit (equivalent to Yuan-Bentler corrected test statistic). Measures of CFI and RMSEA are based on robust estimates for nonnormal data (Brosseau-Liard et al., 2012; Brosseau-Liard & Savalei, 2014). All models control for acquiescence and extreme responding